Takeshima

Takeshima problem

Takeshima (South Korea greatness and Tokto) is located in the northwest about 157 kilos (Shimane Prefecture and Oki Islands).
Japan formally incorporated into Shimane Prefecture in 1905, and faced year 100 in this year. One side, and when "[Riuketamawa] evening line" is set in 52, South Korea insists on dominium, makes security force reside for 54 years, and is "Effect rule" as lighthouse and heliport are constructed. Japan is repeating the protest as an illegal occupancy.

Takeshima is 1952 ..South Korea... ｢[Riuketamawa] evening line(Japanese fishing boat off-limits line. It is 'Peaceful line. ' in South Korea)After the sea area is declared "Oceanic sovereignty" including Takeshima by", it keeps ruling the effect.
Japanese Government incorporates Senkaku Islands into a Japanese territory on the site investigation in 1895. Thereafter, the effect rule of Japan is done as the Japanese resides and the dried bonito factory is made. A Chinese government insists on the dominium of Senkaku Islands in 1971.

｢It is recorded, Takeshima and [**misasagi] (stricken angle) islands are 'Northwest limit' of Japan in the inspection record of Oki that the Matsue feudal soldier wrote in 1667. Two Yonago tradesmen in the Tottori clan obtained the take a passage permission from the shogunate to [**misasagijima] for 17 years that preceded this. It is clear to recognize the territory Takeshima in which the shogunate is located [**misasagijima] and on the way of that and to have ruled the effect. The Meiji era government notified of Takeshima based on this fact in 1905, and the Cabinet Council was decided a Japanese territory, and Shimane Prefecture notified of the prefecture soil incorporation. ｣

｢[Shiteiruno] in ..South Korea side.. [yoridokoro] is an authentic record at the dynasty of 1728. There is a testimony record of the person's named [yasuryuu**] that stows away to Japan in this negotiating direct with the Tottori feudal lord, and having admitted [**misasagijima] and Takeshima are Korean territories. Moreover, [yasuryuu**] is talked about, 'Takeshima mentioned in Japan is Korean territory [dearu] [**yama] ([usan]) island'. ｣
｢The whereabouts of [**yamajima] was not clear in Korea though [**misasagijima] had been admitted a Korean territory after it was incorporated into Silla Kingdom for 512 years either. It is assumed that [sorewo] [yasuryuu**] made Japan admit, is treated the hero, and it appears in the history textbook of South Korea now. However, it turns out that [yasukyoujutsu] was complete false if it compares it with the document of Japan. ｣

"When there was not a happening way like the dominium problem etc. about Takeshima by which it did not stop, and either the take a passage to [**] mausoleum island was prohibited by the shogunate in 1696, Takeshima was not made a problem even by the fishermen on the solitary island in the distant sea. "

｢To examine whether [**misasagijima] had to be developed in 1882, Korea did fieldwork. However, it doesn't approach Takeshima. It is evidence that Korea was not recognizing the territory Takeshima. ｣

South Korea thinks, Takeshima is "The first sacrifice ground" of the Korea invasion by Japan.

｢After 1696, Takeshima was blank when it did not belong to Japan and North Korea either ground. At that time, land where the ruler did not exist was admitted to be occupied as [houkotowari] of International Law, and there was not an obligation to tell Korea the Takeshima Day this incorporation either. ｣

｢Be not to assume Japan to be thoughtless words in South Korea when the Takeshima problem happened, for Japan to object in it, and the problem to have objected. Takeshima is a territory in the important one of Japan-South Korea which is not fought over. The discussion of based on a historical fact starting with the ordinance enactment of Takeshima Day is expected to happen. ｣

Though the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Japan is insisting, "Takeshima is a historically peculiar territory to my country on International Law".

"From beginning to end in the 17th century to middle of a very crude explanation through granting of the shogunate the take a passage permission to the Yonago tradesman in the Tottori clan etc. though it is an insistence of Japanese Government to have ruled the effect, and it is realities in the peculiar territory theory that grounds are thin. "

In the document spread to the house of the tradesman who obtained the take a passage permission, it is when [**misasagijima] and Takeshima were done from the shogunate in "Receive".

｢It is originally impossible that the shogunate distributes it to the tradesman even if land belongs to the lord everything, and the uninhabited island at the feudal period. It is in several-generation of person who obtained the take a passage permission back that the document was written. The descendant might overvalue ancestor's achievement and the expression such as 'Received' be used. ｣

｢Japan prohibited the take a passage to [**misasagijima] in 1696. It means the owning intention denial of Takeshima. Japanese Government said, 'The shogunate was a take a passage to forbidding [tanoha] [**misasagijima] at that time and Takeshima was not forbidden', and the person who went to Takeshima by the take a passage prohibition was broken off, too. Takeshima should be thought recognition as the one of Korea. ｣

｢It is again. The Japanese in the Meiji era over ..entering.. [ruto] [**misasagijima] began to appear again. [**misasagijima] and another one island decided the Dajokan like 'It is unrelated to our country' as for the Meiji era government next year while the development application of this island had been put out in 1876. It is expected that 'It is one island besides' will indicate Takeshima that is the belonging island. In a word, there is what insists on the owning intention though said by Japan at Edo period and the Meiji era that Takeshima is an irrelevant island twice. ｣

Korea executed automating [**misasagijima] for years. After all, Takeshima : it is necessary not to have seen Takeshima on the belonging island in no whose it.

｢It was assumed that [**misasagijima] was declared to be a territory in the [dai] empire decree in 1900, and it had jurisdiction over 'Ishijima' of the belonging island. Ishijima is thought Takeshima, and the owning country has already been decided. ｣

｢The research of South Korea certainly has a fatal defect of treating for a fact without seeing the historical materials of Japan at all about the testimony to beginning [niaru] [yasuryuu**] in the Takeshima question. South Korea is also the same in the point of historical view of one country principle. Whenever the Takeshima problem surfaces, the clarification of a thorough historical fact is requested from South Korea media because appearance [suruno] is [yasuryuu**]. ｣

｢After it parts from the peculiar territory theory once, Japanese Government should recover the discussion from the start. Any productive results cannot be expected only in the place where the two countries carp at a fault. It is necessary to give historical materials mutually, and to make the common ring about which it calmly talks. ｣